🔗 Share this article

The protest movement may not be broadcast, yet it might possess webbed feet and protruding eyes.

Furthermore, it may involve the horn of a unicorn or a chicken's feathers.

As demonstrations against the administration carry on in American cities, participants have embraced the energy of a local block party. They've offered salsa lessons, given away treats, and performed on unicycles, while armed law enforcement look on.

Combining levity and political action – an approach experts refer to as "tactical frivolity" – has historical precedent. However, it has emerged as a hallmark of US demonstrations in the current era, adopted by all sides of the political spectrum.

One particular emblem has emerged as notably significant – the frog. It began when a video of an encounter between an individual in an inflatable frog and immigration enforcement agents in the city of Portland, became an internet sensation. And it has since spread to protests nationwide.

"There's a lot going on with that small blow-up amphibian," notes a professor, a professor at UC Davis and a Guggenheim Fellow who focuses on creative activism.

From a Cartoon Frog to Portland

It's challenging to discuss protests and frogs without mentioning Pepe, an illustrated figure co-opted by far-right groups throughout a political race.

As the character gained popularity on the internet, its purpose was to signal certain emotions. Subsequently, it was deployed to express backing for a candidate, including a particular image shared by the candidate himself, depicting the frog with recognizable attire and hairstyle.

The frog was also portrayed in right-wing online communities in more extreme scenarios, as a hate group member. Users traded "unique frog images" and set up digital currency using its likeness. His catchphrase, "feels good, man", was used a coded signal.

But Pepe didn't start out as a political symbol.

The artist behind it, artist Matt Furie, has expressed about his unhappiness for its appropriation. Pepe was supposed to be simply a "chill frog-dude" in his series.

This character first appeared in comic strips in 2005 – non-political and famous for a particular bathroom habit. A film, which chronicles Mr Furie's efforts to reclaim ownership of his work, he stated the character was inspired by his experiences with companions.

As he started out, Mr Furie tried sharing his art to new websites, where people online began to borrow, remix and reinvent his character. When the meme proliferated into the more extreme corners of online spaces, Mr Furie sought to reject his creation, even killing him off in a final panel.

However, its legacy continued.

"This demonstrates that creators cannot own symbols," explains Prof Bogad. "They transform and be reclaimed."

Previously, the notoriety of Pepe meant that frogs were predominantly linked to the right. A transformation occurred in early October, when a confrontation between an activist dressed in an inflatable frog costume and an immigration officer in Portland, Oregon captured global attention.

This incident came just days after a decision to send the National Guard to the city, which was described as "war-ravaged". Activists began to gather in droves on a single block, just outside of an ICE office.

Emotions ran high and an agent used a chemical agent at the individual, aiming directly into the ventilation of the puffy frog costume.

The protester, Seth Todd, reacted humorously, saying he had tasted "spicier tamales". But the incident went viral.

The costume fit right in for the city, known for its quirky culture and left-wing protests that embrace the unusual – outdoor exercise, retro fitness classes, and nude cycling groups. The city's unofficial motto is "Embrace the Strange."

The frog even played a role in a lawsuit between the federal government and the city, which contended the deployment overstepped authority.

While a judge decided in October that the administration had the right to send personnel, a dissenting judge wrote, noting in her opinion the protesters' "known tendency for wearing chicken suits when expressing their disagreement."

"It is easy to see this decision, which accepts the government's characterization as a battlefield, as merely absurd," the dissenting judge wrote. "Yet the outcome is not merely absurd."

The order was stopped legally subsequently, and personnel are said to have left the area.

Yet already, the amphibian costume had transformed into a significant anti-administration symbol for progressive movements.

The costume was spotted nationwide at No Kings protests recently. There were frogs – along with other creatures – in major US cities. They appeared in rural communities and global metropolises abroad.

The inflatable suit was sold out on online retailers, and saw its cost increase.

Mastering the Optics

The link between the two amphibian symbols – is the dynamic between the silly, innocent image and underlying political significance. This is what "tactical frivolity."

This approach relies on what the professor terms a "disarming display" – usually humorous, it acts as a "appealing and non-threatening" display that calls attention to a cause without needing explicitly stating them. This is the silly outfit you wear, or the symbol you share.

Mr Bogad is an analyst in the subject and someone who uses these tactics. He authored a book called 'Tactical Performance', and led seminars internationally.

"One can look back to historical periods – when people are dominated, they use absurdity to speak the truth a little bit and still have a layer of protection."

The idea of this approach is multi-faceted, he explains.

As activists confront authority, a silly costume {takes control of|seizes|influences